Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Toucan Sam and the military-industrial complex

Bilde


I recently read that Kellogg's, the cereal giant, is suing a group called the Maya Archaeology Initiative, because the MAI is using a toucan as part of its logo.

 

 

No lie.

 

 

The MAI is fighting back very shrewdly. They point out that the toucan in their logo (see the image at the head of this column) is modeled on a real toucan, whereas Toucan Sam is, well, a cartoon character.

 

 

Also, there is this charmingly insensitive commercial, using vaguely Mesoamerican tropes like step pyramids and feather-wearing witch doctors with high shrieky voices.

 

 

I point this out to Partner, and he grunts. “Corporations are the new nations,” he said. “Haven't you noticed? They'll probably win their lawsuit. They can get whatever they want.”

 

 

“Like 'Rollerball,'” I said, catching on.

 

 

“Exactly,” he said.

 

 

I have been musing on this ever since. The other evening I was catching up on back issues of the Financial Times when I came across, on one single page, companies called Rotork, Spectris, Petrofac, Essar, and (best of all) Astorg.

 

 

What are they, daleks?

 

 

I am not frightened of corporations in general, any more than I'm frightened of nations in general. They're abstractions, run by groups of rather silly people, no more intelligent than you or me.

 

 

But I think Partner is right. Nations are beginning to seem a little – hm – twentieth-century. Look at Libya! Look at Afghanistan! Borders are really meaningless. All that matters – from a global point of view, anyway – is what can be gotten out of a given geographical area: natural resources, manpower, strategic advantage. And corporations – oil companies, drug companies, mining companies, agricultural companies – can extract these things easily.

 

 

Mitt Romney, you may know, recently told someone at one of his campaign appearances that “corporations are people too, my friend.”

 

 

No, Mitt, they are not. They are legal entities created by people, for the benefit of a few people – owners, shareholders – through the employment of the labor of some other people. All the nice folks at Hewlett-Packard don't get together at the end of the day and roll around in the vault; only a few people at the top get to do that. The rest of us – well, read this little tract by my friends Karl and Friedrich, if you haven't already. Almost 200 years later, I still find it refreshing.

 

 

From Robert Bly's “Those Being Eaten By America”:

 

 

The world will soon break up into small colonies of the saved

 

 

Soon, I hope. Soon.

 


 

Monday, September 5, 2011

Labor Day blog: Arturo Toscanini conducts "The Internationale"

Workers-unite


It's almost 2012 – another gottverdammt election year – and I don't know if I'll live through it. The political commercials alone will probably give me an ulcer, if not a coronary.

 

 

So, for Labor Day, here's something a little closer to my core beliefs: the old international workers' anthem, the “Internationale.” conducted by Arturo Toscanini. I find it soothing.

 

 

Arise, ye victims of oppression!

 

 

And happy Labor Day.

 

 

 


 

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Consumers of the world, unite

 


David Pogue had two related pieces in the New York Times recently.  One was a review of something called the Vulkano, which should be the answer to everyone's prayer: a TiVo that also allows you to watch your at-home TV programming on the road, and on your mobile device, and on your computer.

This sounds great, but according to Pogue, it's not. The device, as he describes it, is pretty flawed: it's technologically limited, the menus are overcomplicated, it makes you do all kinds of elaborate quasi-programming stuff. And it's $380.  Not cheap, especially for something that doesn't work very well.

Pogue (who is never at a loss for words) also spun a second piece out of this: a little essay wondering why companies sell sub-standard products. What do they gain, after all?  He posits three possible corporate mindsets:

  • We'll just fix it later.”

  • We don't know what we're doing.”

  • We're doomed anyway, so we may as well market the thing the way it is."

 

He leaves out the one that I tend to favor, however:

  • We're completely amoral and will make money any way we can, even with a substandard product.”

 

I still remember reading Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, with its depictions of the horrible pre-union pre-regulation Chicago meat industry, and I can still visualize the scene in which one of the workers falls into a vat and gets rendered into lard.  (It was a long time before I ate corned beef again, thank you very much.)

Most flawed products these days aren't quite Soylent Green, but the profit motive is still as lively as ever.  

This is where we consumers get to exert market pressure on these cheese-eating money-grubbing vile cynical companies, kids:

  • Do your research.

  • Read the reviews.

  • Whenever possible, go to the store and look at / fondle / play with the technology you're interested in.

  • Don't buy a piece of rubbish, just because it's new and makes a lot of promises.  

 

In a word: don't eat the corned beef unless you're pretty sure that it's good corned beef.

To quote another famous consumer advocate: you have nothing to lose but your chains.