Total Pageviews

Saturday, December 31, 2011

New Year's Eve 2011: looking backward

Sunset-1


Here we are, standing in the ashes of another year.  How the hell did 2011 pass so quickly?

 

 

The years all begin to look alike, after you’ve seen fifty or so of them.  It took me a minute to recollect the notable / memorable things that happened this year:

 

 

-        Partner and I took some nice trips, twice to Cape Cod and once to Orlando (Disney / Universal, naturally).

-        We got through the year without serious illness or injury (not counting some violent viral episodes, and Partner’s little muscle sprain in November).

-        People passed away.  My uncle Sonny passed away in the Northwest.  A friend’s husband passed away after a long illness.  The husband of another friend passed away, after a similarly long illness.  My old boss Sharon, for whom I worked in the late 1980s and who was my colleague, neighbor and friend after that time, passed away suddenly in November.

-        I managed to keep track of the people who matter: my old college friend George, my old work friend Patricia who now lives in the wild country of northwestern Massachusetts, my old work friend Sylvia who works in the wild country down around the Rhode Island School of Design.

 

 

 

Partner and I have a little tradition: just before midnight on New Year’s Eve, we get together and hold hands so that we’re together when the new year begins.  And we both make a sincere wish that, a year from now, we will still be together, doing exactly the same thing.

 

 

It’s worked pretty well so far. 

 

 

I’m sure we’ll be doing it again this evening.

 

 

And, I hope, a year from now too.

 

 

Happy New Year’s Eve, kids.


 

Friday, December 30, 2011

Burning down the school

Dsci0173


I do not make efficient use of Facebook, I think; I just sort of mooch around and look at this and that.  I only have about thirty friends, which (my student employees tell me) is completely pathetic.

 

 

The other day I was looking through my various Facebook affiliations, and I noticed that, a long time ago, I’d joined a group called “Battle Ground High School Alumni.”  I looked in, and learned that –

 

 

That they just burned down my old elementary school.

 

 

It was on purpose.  The school was an old building, very dilapidated, and completely unused for a number of years.  All the local fire departments got together and used it, this past December 10, for a training exercise.  

 

 

Why am I so strangely saddened by this?

 

 

I remember the building vividly.  I remember how enormous the front steps seemed to me, and how vast the playground; I remember lining up two by two to go to recess and to come back inside, and I remember buying little red tickets for two cents each, to redeem for half-pint cartons of milk.  I remember Miss Plowman, and Miss Marvin, and Mister Ellertson.  (All of these memories are drenched in bright sunlight, for some reason, which seems odd, considering that it rains a lot in Battle Ground.  Could it be that my memory isn’t perfectly accurate?  Hmm.)

 

 

Back in 2008, Partner and I walked through Battle Ground one quiet afternoon and explored the school grounds.  The building was there – see above picture (drenched in bright sunlight) – but it was so small!  It was much bigger when I was a kid.  We played on the swings for a while (I will spare you those photos), and I took pictures and felt somehow comforted that this small piece of my childhood still remained.

 

 

And now it’s gone. 

 

 

The first house I lived in as a child was torn down years ago.  The other house I lived in was sold in 2000, and has been so completely renovated that, even on Google Earth, it’s almost unrecognizable.  Partner’s childhood home was sold a few years ago.  The restaurant in which Partner and I shared our first dinner burned down in 2006.

 

 

From the Buddha’s Fire Sermon:

 

 

"Monks, everything is burning. Burning with what? Burning with the fire of passion, the fire of aversion, the fire of delusion. Burning, I tell you, with birth, aging and death, with sorrows, lamentations, pains, distresses, and despairs.

 


"Seeing this, the disciple grows disenchanted with the eye, the ear, the nose, the tongue, the body, disenchanted with tactile sensations, disenchanted with consciousness at the body, disenchanted with contact at the body. He grows disenchanted with the intellect, disenchanted with ideas, disenchanted with consciousness at the intellect, disenchanted with contact at the intellect.

 


"Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion, he discerns that 'Birth is depleted, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.' " 

 

 

So there is a lesson here.

 

 

But it is a painful one.

 

 

Goodbye, school.

 


 

 

Thursday, December 29, 2011

All my (useless) gadgets

Electronic_waste


I have a box – no, two boxes – of cords and connections belonging to various computing devices. 

 

 

The devices themselves are long gone.

 

 

How does this happen?

 

 

Last year I bought a cheap ($40) Kobo Literati e-reader at Bed Bath & Beyond.  I liked it, but it was slow and balky.  Barnes & Noble had an online sale for reconditioned Nooks, so I bought one ($80), and loved it, until it started acting wonky.  Then, a few months ago, my office granted me an iPad, and the Nook joined the Literati on the unused-gadget shelf.

 

 

Goodbye and good luck, my one hundred and twenty dollars.

 

 

I’ve always been very conscientious about backing up my computer. Some years ago I heard of this great new backup system: the Jazz drive.  I bought one on eBay, for maybe $40, and a bunch of Jazz disks (which are like cassettes on steroids) for maybe $25.  I used it probably four times.  It was clunky and noisy and difficult to set up.  I now own a smooth little candy-bar sized storage device that plugs into my laptop with a USB connection, and which slurps up all my data effortlessly.

 

 

Another sixty-five bucks down the tube.

 

 

I could go on forever.  I am too cheap to buy a proper iPod, so I have purchased at least three cheap imitations, none of which works right, total cost (estimated) sixty bucks.  Then there was the reconditioned laptop, which was wonderful and lasted for about a year, until it actually had a nervous breakdown, complete with beeping and booping sound effects.  Two hundred dollars down the drain.  (Moral, if you haven’t been keeping track: don’t buy reconditioned items.)  The next laptop lasted quite a while – four years, maybe – but it became painfully slow and difficult to use during its last year of active service.  It was around four hundred bucks, I think.

 

 

(My current Dell Inspiron laptop also cost around four hundred bucks; I think I bought it in early 2009, and it is going strong almost three years later.  It has some quirks – it often refuses to recharge its battery – but it is light and easy to use, and I am partial to it.  I had a whirlwind love affair with the iPad when I first got it a few months ago, but – as someone online wisely stated not long ago – the iPad is not a laptop.  Laptops are far more powerful and speedier, and much easier to use for word processing (it is not pleasant to type on a smooth glass surface).  I just bought one of those fancy iPad cases with a built-in Bluetooth keyboard, which makes it a bit nicer to use, but iPads are mostly for travel, I think: it was a godsend on our last two trips, to Orlando and to Cape Cod.  At home, my laptop is (as Eloise said of Nanny) my mostly companion.

 

 

But I still visualize all that money flown out the window, for all those lovely glittering gadgets I bought, thinking they would change my life. 

 

 

A few of them did. 

 

 

But I should have chosen more carefully. 

 

 

Let’s face it.  I’m an idiot.


 

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Christmas: the light and the dark

Tumblr_lwkit6s2f01qe8tn3o3_1280


Simon Schama, the British historian, wrote a nice piece in last weekend’s Financial Times about Christmas and Hanukkah.  Some years back, he took heat for daring to comment that the emphasis on lights in Christmas (all those twinkly bulbs on the tree!) and Hanukkah (all those candles!) was just a holdover from the very traditional celebration of light at the Solstice. 

 

 

Hm.  Is there really any doubt about this?

 

 

Anyway: he repeated a very nice Mishnah story I’d never heard.   In it, Adam was very grieved by the onset of the first winter, realizing that he’d caused it himself, and fasted for eight days, right before the Solstice.  When he realized that the days were getting longer again, he rejoiced for eight days.

 

 

Partner asked me about the timings of sunset and sunrise around the Solstice the other day, so I resorted to Wikipedia.  Do you know how many cultures observe the Solstice?  Pretty much all of them.  And it’s always about light, one way or another

 

 

Okay. Now let’s talk about Christmas tragedies.

 

 

This year alone:

 

 

-        A house burned down in Stamford, Connecticut, killing five people.

-        A man – dressed as Santa, yet – came into an Grapevine, Texas house and shot six family members, and then shot himself.

 

 

Remember the Banda Aceh tidal wave in 2004?

 

 

Remember the 2003 earthquake in Iran?

 

 

Well – what of it?  Bad things happen all the time.  There’s no reason that they shouldn’t happen now.

 

 

Except that they seem especially painful now, this time of year.

 

 

It’s the darkest time of year.  The darkness is winning, and we desperately want to see the light triumphant. When we see bad things happen, it’s as if we can actually feel the struggle between light and darkness.  And we do not want the darkness to win.

 

 

The only exceptional event that I’ve listed above is the man in the Santa suit who killed his family members on Xmas.  It makes you think about the expectations of families on Christmas – the desperate effort to believe that everything will be all right – and that these unrealistic expectations might be enough for make someone snap and kill his family.

 

 

That’s a special kind of madness, especially horrible.  I tried to think about what it would be like to see a family member in a Santa suit come into the room toting a shotgun, and –

 

 

Enough.

 

 

Let the darkness go.  The days are getting longer again.

 

 

As I’ve said once before in this space: hail the Unconquered Sun!

 


 

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

A fine secular Christmas

Starofjesusisreason


Neither Partner nor I practices any particular religion.  I spent a couple of years in the mid-2000s trying to recapture my Catholicism, but found it ultimately futile.  Partner and I talk about Buddhism a lot, but I am uneasily aware that Buddhism is easier to talk about than practice.  (For those of you who use “Zen” as an adjective, I recommend a wonderful and very acerbic book called “What Makes You Not A Buddhist,” by a wonderful Bhutanese lama / film director / author (!) named Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse.)

 

 

So how did Partner and I, both filthy heathens, spend this Christmas season?

 

 

Let’s see:

 

 

-        We saw “The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo” on Christmas Eve.

-        We exchanged gifts.  Partner gave me a lovely sweater and two lovely shirts.  I like pretty colors, but am often confused by the bright lights in the department stores; Partner corrects my fashion sense, and I invariably get compliments when I wear the things he’s bought for me (so long as I wear them in the combinations he very carefully specifies).  I gave him, among other things, a mounted 1957 one-dollar Silver Certificate.  (I was born in 1957, before the Space Age, so it was a little symbolic.)

-        Next morning, we sleepily wished each other a Merry Christmas.

-        After some discussion, we went to the closest casino, Twin River, in Lincoln, Rhode Island.

-        We left at 1:00 pm with considerably more money than we arrived with.  Merry Christmas!

-        We went to a Chinese restaurant and ordered everything on the menu. 

-        We ate until we were sick.

-        We took our leftovers and went home and napped a bit.

-        In the evening, I baked cookies.

 

 

This is the perfect secular Xmas, as far as I’m concerned.  And here’s why:

 

 

 

-        We both spent it with someone we loved.

 

 

 

And that’s all it takes.

 

 

Happy holidays, kids.

 


 

Monday, December 26, 2011

For Hanukkah: Jewish superheroes

Jewishthing_1


Speaking as a Gentile, of all the Jewish holidays, I like Hanukkah best.

 

 

Fine, it’s not a High Holiday, it’s an observance.  The gifts are bush-league: chocolate coins, colorful pencils.  Maybe, if you’re lucky, you get a shirt and pants.  But the candles are pretty.  And it’s eight days long.  And who doesn’t like potato pancakes?  Or playing dreidel?

 

 

But I was especially amused to find the above image on Tumblr recently.

 

 

Evidently Ben Grimm – the everlovin’ blue-eyed Thing from Marvel Comics – is Jewish!  

 

 

I love the yarmulke, and the prayer shawl, and most especially the big smile, and most most most especially the fact that this was drawn by classic Marvel artist Jack Kirby (born Jacob Kurtzberg).


 

I like the idea of Jewish superheroes.  They’re fictional characters right alongside Miss Elizabeth Bennett and Artur Sammler and Genji, so why not?  I looked online, and found that Doc Samson (who’s a sort of semi-Hulk in the Marvel universe) and Volcana (a heroine/villainess in the Marvel world) are both Jewish, as are a few others.  (Evidently the DC universe is non-denominational.  Although I would not be surprised to discover that the Kents brought up Clark as a Methodist.)

 

 

A Kuwaiti Muslim writer named Naif al-Mutawa has, for the past few years, been developing a line of Muslim comics called “The 99.”  The backstory is that a group of Medieval Muslim thinkers / philosophers / clerics harnessed the energy of the 99 names of Allah, but a villain tried to absorb all the power himself; he mostly failed, but the energy of the 99 names went out into the world, and has been absorbed by 99 other people.  One by one they come forward: The Light, The Powerful, The Listener, the Healer, the Destroyer.

 

 

I like this too.

 

 

We still love mythology, don’t we?  And superheroes are the playactors in our modern versions of those miracle stories and myths.  Did you notice, in last summer’s “Thor,” that the title character died to save his friends, and came back to life?   And I seem to recall the very same thing happening in 2006’s “Superman Returns.”  And think of all the angst and cosmic love triangles in the various X-Men stories –

 

 

Enough.

 

 

Cosmic drama and resurrection are terrific things, but sometimes it's nicer to have candles and potato pancakes and chocolate money.

 

 

Gut yontif, Ben Grimm, wherever you are.

 


 

Sunday, December 25, 2011

For Christmas: Sus, pastoureu di mountagno

Mtales04


Even as a nonbeliever, I like Christmas carols.  (As Lisa Simpson, the vegetarian, said once about meat: "Hey, I still like the smell.")  I like unusual carols, and especially folk carols that have a whiff of pagandom about them.

This tune is from the early 17th century, from Avignon in southern France.  It's in Provencal, so don't worry if you can't make out the lyrics.  It's the story of the shepherds hurrying off to the stable to see Mary and the baby Jesus.  (The title means "Get up, shepherd of the mountains!")

I especially like this one because it has a tongue-twister refrain.  It took me years to get it right.

All together now:

Aro lo bon Jesu, lo bon Jesu, lo bon Jesu,
Aro lo bon Jesu d'una vierge nous es na.

(Now the good Jesus, etc.,
 now the good Jesus to a virgin is born unto us.)

Merry Christmas, and may we all meet in heaven, if there's such a place.  

I don't really believe it, but it would be lovely.


Sus_pastores.mp3 Listen on Posterous

 

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Christmas Eve

Christmas-tree-on-beach-1440x900


You know I usually present something unusual and/or different for holidays.  Well, this is Christmas Eve, and for weeks I tried to think of something, but I kept coming up blank.

 

 

And then I think I finally realized why.

 

 

Christmas Eve was pretty much the only holiday my whole family celebrated consistently.  We were semi-dysfunctional: not really Dr. Phil material, but with lots of secrets and dislikes and disagreements boiling under the surface.  As a kid, I didn’t realize this.  I was much younger than my siblings, and I thought Christmas Eve was terrific: it was all about gifts, right?   I couldn’t understand why my mother seemed to dread it so much, and why so many arguments broke out among my siblings, and why my father seemed even quieter than usual.

 

 

When I got older and began to get involved in the arguments myself, I understood.

 

 

Time passed.  I moved out on my own, and I still had this yearning feeling that Christmas Eve was special – magical, somehow – and that I had to observe it.  I decorated the house (as my mother always did).  I went to Mass sometimes.  I listened to music and tried to feel spiritual, or at least uplifted.

 

 

Most of the time it didn’t work.

 

 

When Partner and I moved in together, I was still decorating, a bit.  I like mixing it up: I love, for example, lighting a menorah for the eight nights of Hanukkah.  No, I’m not Jewish, but it’s very pretty, especially on the last few nights when lots of candles are burning at the same time and it looks like a forest fire on the mantel.  But I used to put up a (small) (artificial) tree,  and a crèche, and a little plastic Joseph-and-Mary tableau on top of the TV set. 

 

 

Year by year, I’ve done less and less.

 

 

Now, at last, I understand my mother’s diffidence and reluctance. 

 

 

And this is why, I think, I have a kind of mental block about Christmas Eve.

 

 

It’s Christmas Eve again.  I wish I felt magical again; I wish I felt as if things were somehow going to be okay.

 

 

But I don’t.

 

 

Tomorrow, for Christmas, I promise: something nicer.

 

 

But you just wait.  If this retreat from Christmas hasn't happened to you yet, just wait.  It'll happen to you too.

 


 

 

Friday, December 23, 2011

Capers and pesto and brains, oh my!

31wqzg5fsml

There was an article in the Wall Street Journal recently about the research being done by the various casual-dining restaurants like Olive Garden and Appleby’s and Longhorn Steakhouse and TGI Friday’s.  

 

 

Naturally they are trying to figure out what people like, and what dishes are most popular, and what people like.

 

 

But they are also trying not to be bland.  So they try – or test-market – new things.

 

 

And their discoveries are startling.

 

 

Applebee’s tried putting okra on steaks.  People couldn’t figure it out.

 

 

Olive Garden tried pesto.  Pesto!  One of the glories of Italian cuisine!  The marriage of basil and olive oil and garlic!  And people found it “oily, bitter, and green.”  (And it’s gloopy-looking, don’t forget.)

 

 

Best of all, Olive Garden has stopped using capers.  People found them to be “unexpected.”

 

 

I love capers.  Before I go on, let me give you the simplest of all possible recipes, for something called a “Maltese sandwich”:

 

 

-        Take two nice large slices of fresh bread (preferably French or Italian, but anything will do.)

-        Pour some olive oil on a dinner plate.  Sprinkle the oil with salt and pepper.

-        Take the bread and rub it on the oiled plate, so that the seasoned oil soaks into the bread.

-        Now: pile sliced fresh tomatoes on the bread.

-        Top with a healthy dose of capers.

 

 

I think you will find this as delicious as I do. 

 

 

And, from the other side of the fence, here’s a quote from Nora Ephron’s novel “Heartburn”:

 

 

“I was hired by the caper people to develop a lot of recipes using capers, and it was weeks of tossing capers into everything but milkshakes before I came to terms with the fact that nobody really likes capers no matter what you do with them.  Some people pretend to like capers, but the truth is that any dish that tastes good with capers in it tastes even better with capers not in it.”

 

 

I am one of those people who pretend to like capers.  I think they are very interesting; I keep them in the fridge.  I don’t put them in milkshakes, that’s for sure.  But they are salty and interesting, and they pop very slightly when you bite into them.  They are the anchovies of the plant kingdom, and god bless them.  I don’t put them in everything, but I think they complement spicy foods and highly-flavored foods very nicely.  And, as I demonstrated above, they are wonderful when married to fresh tomatoes and salt and pepper and olive oil.

 

 

So what’s the problem at Olive Garden?

 

 

Americans – the Great Unwashed, as they used to be called – are timid.  They like what they like: salt, and fat, and sweet.  They want their food to look normal.  They do not want to be challenged.  (I do not mean to sound snobbish or classist here.   I’ve seen this in real life, however.  I’ve seen otherwise intelligent people baffled by butterfly pasta and couscous and fennel and, yes, capers.  To quote Confucius on their behalf: “If I do not recognize it, I do not put it in my mouth.”)

 

 

But oh what they (and Confucius) are missing!

 

 

 

I was a very picky eater as a child.  I wouldn’t even eat eggs or tomatoes.  (Some scientists are positing that picky eating in childhood is natural, a genetic defense against eating strange / unusual / dangerous food.  The problem is that some people take this pickiness with them into adulthood.)

 

 

As an adult, I’m far more adventurous gastronomically.  I’ve eaten deer, antelope, moose, elk, snake, camel, gazelle, kidneys, heart, liver, brains, balls –

 

 

Okay.  Some are better than others.  I’ve only had balls once, and I can live without them: they’re spongy and a little flavorless.  The others are interesting in their own ways.

 

 

But really.  Okra?  Capers?

 

 

Grow up, kids.

 


 

Showing disrespect at Christmas

214817-bad-gift-opening-slide_slide


It is the Christmas / Hanukkah / Kwanzaa season, which means giving stuff to people.  I like this, actually.  I like getting stuff (although it makes me feel all blushy and humble), and (when I’m flush) I like giving things away.

 

 

When money’s tight, however – as in the present economy – I try to be frugal.

 

 

I am cheap in any case.  Apollonia asked how much I give my newspaper guy for Xmas, and guffawed in amusement when I told her.  “That’s not enough,” she said.  “Think of what a miserable job it is.  He’s up hours before you are.  He deserves a little more than that.”

 

 

“He’s a newspaper-delivery guy,” I said.  “He’s back in bed by ten a.m.  I only wish I were.”

 

 

Naturally there are people who deserve nice gifts.  Candy is a nice gift, as is liquor.  Besides, when it’s someone you know well, you pretty much know what they’d like: you know what they wear and where they shop.  It’s easy.

 

 

Now, for those of you who work in offices: how about the people you don’t like?

 

 

You know who I mean.

 

 

You can’t afford to piss them off – not too much, anyway.  You’d like to give them nothing at all, but you’ve got to give them something

 

 

Regifting is always an interesting option.  I often end up with several bottles of wine at Christmastime, and I don’t drink wine, so it gets passed along.  But I generally give this to people I like, whom I know to be drinkers of wine.

 

 

So what else is there?

 

 

How about a nice box of candy from Ocean State Job Lot, the local odds-and-ends discount store?  It’s imported (possibly from the Ukraine!).  It’s nicely wrapped.  It’s – well, who knows? - a little old.  You pick it up for two bucks, and give it to the person in the office you don’t like.

 

 

Outwardly it’s nice.  In reality, it’s a snub.  You know it, and the other person knows it.

 

 

Point taken.

 

 

From Gertrude Stein’s “The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas”:

 

 

Hélène [the Stein/Toklas cook] had her opinions, she did not for instance like Matisse. She said a frenchman should not stay unexpectedly to a meal particularly if he asked the servant beforehand what there was for dinner. She said foreigners had a perfect right to do these things but not a frenchman and Matisse had once done it. So when Miss Stein said to her, Monsieur Matisse is staying for dinner this evening, she would say, in that case I will not make an omelette but fry the eggs. It takes the same number of eggs and the same amount of butter but it shows less respect, and he will understand.

 

 

 

Get it, Monsieur Matisse?

 


 

Thursday, December 22, 2011

For the winter solstice: Lincoln Chafee's holiday tree, and why I am no longer a practicing Catholic

Charlie-brown-christmas-tree


Do we need a special acknowledgement of the solstice?  I suppose so. There was an irruption of the whole stupid “War on Christmas” thing here in Rhode Island this year: the governor, an innocent (and rather dense) Independent named Lincoln Chafee (who’s a very nice guy, and for whom I voted), called the state tree a “holiday tree.”

 

 

(Now, to be fair, this was thick-headed of him.  As my wise co-worker Eileen pointed out today: the city of Providence puts up a big menorah right alongside their Christmas tree, and they don’t call it a “holiday candle holder.”)

 

 

The Providence Catholic Diocese came down on Chafee like a ton of bricks.  How dare he demean Christians in such a way!  Wasn’t he aware that the Christmas tree was a symbol of the birth of Christ?

 

 

(Frankly, I wasn’t aware of that myself.)

 

 

The local Catholic parish priests who have been talking to Fox News, and the local idiot bishop, Thomas Tobin, have been mixing up the whole “Christmas” thing with custom, and belief, and observance, and lots of silliness.  And naturally Fox has been lapping it up.  Apparently having a tree called a “Christmas tree” is vital to the life and health of the Christian /Catholic community, and calling the state tree a “holiday tree” is a slap to all right-thinking and right-believing Christians.

 

 

(I did note that the head of one of the local ecumenical councils asked, futilely, that the whole dispute be forgotten.   Did we, he asked plaintively, think that Jesus would care about this?)

 

 

(Evidently the Catholics – or their squad leaders – think so.)

 

 

Mind you, I used to be a practicing Catholic, up until a couple of years ago.  I struggled mightily to fit their theology into my life.  Around 2006, a year or so after the reactionary new German pope took over the reins of the church, I just gave up.  To my surprise, several people I know did the same thing. 

 

 

We all reached the same conclusion at the same time: the Church was not for us, not anymore.

 

 

This serves as an excellent explanation for Why I Am No Longer A Practicing Catholic.

 

 

Bring on the solstice observances!  Hail the Unconquered Sun!

 

 

And to hell with both Thomas Tobin and Lincoln Chaffee!


 

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

David Lynch's "Dune"

Music_dune


Yesterday morning Apollonia greeted me with: “Ah!  Third-level Guild Navigator!  Have you just folded space from Ix?”

 

 

I smiled serenely.  “Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam!” I said.  “Did you bring your little box of pain?”

 

 

And then we both cackled demonically.

 

 

Now, if you know what the above gibberish means, I give you a gold star.  You are probably laughing too.

 

 

For the rest of you:

 

 

There’s this movie called “Dune,” based on the classic science-fiction novel of the same name by Frank Herbert.  The movie came out in 1984, and it starred about a hundred people.  It’s set in outer space in the far future.  It was directed by David Lynch (of “Twin Peaks” and “Blue Velvet”).  It is one of the most (you should pardon the expression) unearthly movies ever made.  I first saw it projected on a bedsheet behind the Marine Corps House in Tunis in 1985, under the North African stars, and it made a walloping impression on me, and not a day passes that I don’t think of some odd image or line of dialogue from it.

 

 

So what’s so great about it?

 

 

-        Its dialogue.  Spacey, elliptical, almost coded.  It’s as if you’re overhearing a conversation in something that’s almost but not quite English. 

-        Its costumes.  They're a melange (sorry!) of everything from Victorian ballroom attire to Bedouin robes to something resembling 1960s Carnaby Street style, not to mention all kinds of desert-planet sportswear.

-        Its non-reliance on special effects.  The special effects here aren’t much more elaborate than the ones you see in “2001: A Space Odyssey,” made almost twenty years before.  All of the strangeness comes from the sets, and the dialogue, and the costumes, and the acting.  Brad Dourif gives instructions to a group of killers, making odd swooping hand-gestures as he speaks: are the gestures meaningful?  People float through the air, laughing manically: is this normal?  Anyway, you can be absolutely certain that you’re not watching “Gold Diggers of 1933.”

 

 

Apollonia tells me that she has seen a much longer cut on BBC America.  This makes sense: the movie as released, long as it was, was choppy and confusing (which, strangely, adds to its charm.)  (I just read online that David Lynch hates the longer cut and has disowned it.  Naturally.)

 

 

So what is it about this movie that makes it so fascinating? 

 

 

It is a pure ballet of surreal images and ideas, graceful and very sure of itself

 

 

It is alternately violent and serene, and sometimes even funny.

 

 

It has extended scenes in which people ride giant worms.

 

 

And it features Sting in a Speedo with wings (see above photo).

 

 

How can you not rush right out and see it?

 

 

And, kids: tell ‘em the Kwisatz Haderach sent you.

 


 

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Television preview: "RuPaul's Drag Race," season four

510x340


I am in withdrawal right now: RuPaul is on hiatus until next month, when Drag Race resumes.

 

 

RuPaul’s shows are delicious, and funny, and entertaining, and enlightening, and I will tell you why.

 

 

Drag, for some, is just peculiarity: people dressing up, outrageously; men dressing as women, women as men, et cetera.

 

 

But it is so much more.

 

 

As we have seen on past seasons of RuPaul’s Drag Race, there are lots of reasons to dress in drag.  Here are some:

 

 

-        As entertainers.  Why not?  Lots of Drag Race contenders have been drag entertainers.  That’s often how they pay the bills.  Take Manila Luzon, naturally funny, naturally entertaining.

-        As a political statementStacy Layne Matthews, a plus-size contestant from the American South a season or so ago, is an example.  She was great – funny, engaging – but she was mostly there because she was a) black; b) Southern; c) heavy; d) young; and e) generally unaffected by the tidal wave of pro/con gay / Southern / body-conscious opinion in California and New York.   I liked her a lot, especially her chutzpah, and the fact that she was working against a lot of deeply-felt feelings and prejudices.

-        As a statement about gender.  I liked Nina Flowers so much: this funny charming queen was also a stocky muscular tattooed little man.

-        As a career / personal statement.  Take first-season winner Bebe Zahara Benet.  She was absolutely perfect – lovely, very self-possessed – and I was rooting for her, and I loved that a Cameroonian won the competition. But she’s a model: she dresses, and poses, and looks perfect for the camera.  Personality-wise, she is less than thrilling. I like her, but I do not find her stimulating. 

 

 

Is any of this important?

 

 

Not really.

 

 

Bring on the new season!

 

 

(You can see the new competitors here.  Take a look.  I have.  I already know who I like.  We’ll just have to see what happens.)

 

 

Can I get a Ru-ha?

 


 

Monday, December 19, 2011

Losing things

Fishes-st-anthony


Apollonia was inconsolable the other day.   She’d lost her new hand cream.  “I’m really unhappy,” she said.  “It had – precious ingredients.  It’s not the money, mind you.  It’s just the idea that it’s gone.”

 

 

“I understand,” I said.  “Beauty aid, right?  You can’t afford to lose one of those.”

 

 

“I can’t believe,” she said, ignoring me, “that someone would take it.”

 

 

“What precious ingredients?" I said.  "Walnut oil? Cream cheese? Unicorn tears?”

 

 

“Marshmallow,” she said, without irony. 

 

 

She was distraught and would not be comforted.  But I’d lost something too, that same day: my little micro-card reader, a little USB thing that I used

to transfer pictures from my camera to my computer.  It cost five bucks; surely no one would pilfer a thing like that.  Right?

 

 

Right.

 

 

Nah.  Apollonia and I had both misplaced our things, she her hand cream, me my card-reader. 

 

 

It’s hard to accept that your memory is fading.  I chase my coffee cup around the office like an escaped animal; it scampers away from me, and I find it again two days later on the second-floor photocopier.   Except, of course, that’s exactly where I left it, and where everyone thoughtfully let it lie, so that I could find it again.  (Who else in the office has a cup with pictures of Alan Turing and Gertrude Stein on it?  I mean, really.)

 

 

Partner loses his glasses frequently.  I lose my scissors, and my sewing needles, and my nice blue titanium Cross pen that I won in the Financial Times crossword competition.  (Most of the time we find them again.  I lost the pen for good in August, but I won another one a few weeks later, so I can pretend that everything is fine.)

 

 

The young things around the office are amused, I’m sure, at our antics.

 

 

They can just wait.  It’ll happen to them too.

 

 

And please to remember the following magical incantation, which sometimes works:

 

 

Something’s lost that can’t be found.

Please, Saint Anthony, look around!

 


Sunday, December 18, 2011

For Beethoven's birthday: Sonata in F-sharp major, op. 78, first movement

Schroederbeethoven
____________________________________________________________________

Beethoven celebrated his 241st birthday this last week. Nobody's quite sure of the exact day; some people say it was the 16th of December, others the 17th.  Remember Schroeder in "Peanuts"?  He always commemorated it.

 

Here's my commemoration: the remarkable first movement of the op. 78 piano sonata in F-sharp major, as fresh today as it was when he wrote it.

 

Enjoy it.

 

04_Klaviersonate_Nr._24_Fis-dur_op._78_„A_Therese“-I_Adagio_cantabile_–_Allegro_ma_non_troppo.mp3 Listen on Posterous

___________________________________________________________________________

 

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Talking to myself

Count4


The other day I was getting up from my office desk to get an eleventh cup of coffee while muttering to myself.  Just as I got to my office door, a co-worker passed by and glanced at me, and I was pretty sure she could see my lips moving.  Embarrassed, I laughed explosively.  “I was talking to myself,” I said to her as we walked down the hall, “and you caught me.  I’ve always been afraid that this might happen.”

 

 

She laughed.  She’s a cool one, very wry.  “Loren,” she said, “you are always talking to yourself.”


 

O dear me.


 

Yes, I suppose I am.  I talk to myself during the entire walk to work, which is anywhere from fifteen to thirty minutes.  I know I wave my arms when I talk, too; I’ve caught myself doing it.


 

It’s useful.  I recite information, and list things to myself, and practice difficult office conversations, and tell myself jokes, and run the my day’s agenda.  I sing, and I pray (which is especially interesting, given that I’m mostly an atheist).  I have conversations with Partner, although (obviously) he isn’t there to speak for himself.  I recite poetry. 

 

 

Obviously I am losing it.  It’s getting worse; I used to pretend that people didn’t notice, but I can’t make that assumption anymore.  I am a crazy old geezer who talks to himself, that’s all.

 

 

But maybe it’s useful.  Most of the people in the office are under forty years old; a good percentage are under thirty.  They’re wary of old folks.

 

 

Maybe I’ll start muttering to myself even more than I do now.


 

If it alarms them: good.   Anything to keep them off-balance.

 


 

Friday, December 16, 2011

Nearsighted at Christmastime

Cxo_casa


When I was just a kid, and my nearsightedness had just manifested itself (I had German measles around the age of eight, which apparently damaged my eyesight), Christmas was wonderful.  The lights on the Christmas tree were dazzling: swirled together and blurred slightly, as if filmed through a Vaseline-coated lens.  It made “Christmas magic” seem like a real thing.

 

 

I haven’t thought of that in years.  Except:

 

 

The tradition of Christmas lights has never really died here in Rhode Island.  Some communities – East Providence, for example – have whole neighborhoods that blaze with huge displays: reindeer, multiple Santas, wise men, polar bears, penguins, the Virgin Mary, all in multicolored lights.  It is a wonder and a miracle.

 

 

I noticed last year, and even more so this year, that this seems to be growing more widespread.  For a while, the more staid communities only had white lights, or blue, or none at all.  Now people are using those wonderful big multicolored lights that we had when I was a kid, and they’re beautiful.

 

 

Hey! I thought last evening, while walking through the neighborhood and admiring the neighbors’ lights.  I bet, if I take my glasses off, they’ll be so much prettier.  Just like when I was a kid.

 

 

Well, like so many other things, this little morsel of Christmas magic has been taken from me.

 

 

My eyesight has worsened considerably since my childhood.  I knew this, of course, but I figured it would make the swirl of multicolored lights even more interesting.  Trust me: it did not.  It made them sickeningly awful.  White lights turned into a nebulous blur; blue lights were nightmarish.  Multicolored lights were dominated by red and orange tones, and looked like bloated dying masses of stars, pulsing and heaving inward and outward.

 

 

Man, I put my glasses back on real fast after that.

 

 

There must be a moral in this somewhere, I suppose.

 

 

Happy Christmas season, kids!

 


 

 

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Personal fragrances; or, How to become popular by smelling like a muffin

Perfume


Partner and I both cultivate a palette of personal fragrances.  He has a variety of favorites: there’s a Halston fragrance he likes, and a L’Occitane, and sometimes he branches out (I found a bottle of Sean John’s “Unforgivable” on his shelf the other day, and was very impressed that he’s branching out into hip-hop).

 

 

I am faithful to my favorite L’Occitane fragrance, called simply “L’Occitan”; supposedly it has notes of black pepper, nutmeg, cinnamon, and burnt wood, all twined around a musky base.  I like to think it makes me smell mysterious.  On ho-hum days I get by with a spritz of L’Occitane’s Ambre, and I keep their Eau des Vanilliers in the office for emergencies, although I wonder uneasily if if makes me smell a little too much like cream soda.

 

 

You’ll notice a lot of edibles on the above list: pepper, nutmeg, cinnamon, vanilla.  I always noticed that, whenever I wear something that smells edible, I get a lot of attention.  (One day, when I was wearing bay rum, a person sitting next to me in a meeting leaned close to my ear and whispered, “You smell just like a muffin!”  I chose to take it as a compliment.)

 

 

I get most of my New and Trendy Information from my work friend Tab, who is considerably younger than me; I believe he actually graduated from college after the turn of the millennium.   We were hashing over the subject of fragrances, and he brushed aside my old-lady obsession with fancy scents.  “There are really only two fragrances in the gay community today,” he told me authoritatively.  “Older men -“

 

 

“Like you?” I said innocently.

 

 

“Well, yes,” he snarled.  “Anyway, we wear Drakkar Noir.” 

 

 

“And the younger men?”

 

 

“Ah,” he smiled.  “’Fierce,’ by Abercrombie and Fitch.”  He smiled dreamily.  “Whenever I smell it, it puts me on alert.  I know there's something interesting in the vicinity.”

 

 

So, kids, you know your choices.  You can smell like burnt wood and vanilla orchids, like me; you can smell like a hip-hop megastar, like Partner; or you can smell young and cute.

 

 

Or you can smell like a muffin. 

 

 

Which – trust me – will make you popular with a lot of people.


 

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Appreciation: Van Heflin

Vanheflinportrait


It is now mid-December, and Turner Classic Movies is showing its annual “TCM Remembers” video, which commemorates all of the Hollywood people who have died over the past year.  I always find myself going “Oh!”, remembering that Farley Granger, and Dana Wynter, and Len Lesser, and Betty Garrett, and Kenneth Mars, all died this year – and then seeing the long procession of other people of whose passing I was unaware.  TCM always does a lovely job of finding brief evocative clips of the actors and actresses looking beautiful, and the behind-the-scenes people looking dignified and busy and intense.  It invariably makes me sad, and I love it.

 

 

It makes me realize, too, that Hollywood was full of wonderful performers, many of whom even I – the viewer of ten thousand movies, the “Trivial Pursuit: Silver Screen” champion – am unfamiliar with.

 

 

For example:

 

 

It was Van Heflin’s birthday on December 13.  (He would have been 101.)  I had the day off, and I ran errands and was very productive, but for much of the day I had the TV on, and they were running a solid string of Van Heflin movies. 

 

 

Well, I tell you, I had myself a good time.

 

 

I read up on Mister Heflin a bit along the way.  Born in Oklahoma; went to sea; tried acting, wasn’t successful; Katherine Hepburn gave him a little push, and he finally made it; won an Oscar in 1942 for a supporting role in gangster movie called “Johnny Eager”; never really made it as a leading man, but always delivered a solid performance.  Nice face: plain at first, but interesting, and he definitely grows on you.  I can see what Miss Hepburn saw.

 

 

First was “Tennessee Johnson.”  Yes, they actually made a movie biography of President Andrew Johnson!  I only saw the last twenty minutes, which was – of course – the impeachment.  Lionel Barrymore is the snarling senator who wants Heflin/Johnson out of office.  But, of course, as soon as you see Heflin – dignified, courtly, handsome – you realize what’s going to happen.  (Hint: it’s not quite what happened in real life, but it makes for good viewing.)

 

 

Next came “Green Dolphin Street,” and I yelped with joy, as I’d read the novel in my teens: it’s about a 19th-century goofball in New Zealand who proposes by letter to the wrong sister halfway around the world.  (It’s not his fault entirely; he was drunk, and the sisters both had names beginning with “M.”) Anyway, the movie has a great cast – Lana Turner, Donna Reed, Frank Morgan – and Heflin shows up as a tough Englishman in New Zealand, wearing a sort of Maori-styled cowboy outfit.  I could just eat him up.

 

 

I went out to run some errands, but when I came home, one of the most peculiar movies I’ve ever seen had just begun: “East Side, West Side.”  It’s a weepie about virtuous millionairess Barbara Stanwyck and her husband James Mason, a spineless cad who cheats on Barbara with a very kinky Ava Gardner.  (I’ll admit it: Ava Gardner terrifies me.  She always looks as if she’s just eaten a human baby.)  Heflin is a bouncy energetic ex-cop who now works as a mysterious government operative in wartime Europe; he enters the movie as Cyd Charisse’s boyfriend (don’t ask), but falls for Barbara immediately.  There is the sweetest and most unrealistic dumping scene I’ve ever seen, in which Cyd tells Van that he can go do what he likes, and summons another man to the table as if by magic to take his place.  Then follows – what? – a murder mystery!  Ava is found dead, and the murderer is – oh hell, I’ll just tell you – a gigantic blonde bimbo who’s jealous of her.  Apparently she strangled Ava with her huge powerful hands (breaking a nail in the process, which of course is a part of the evidence against her).  When Van goes to collect her, she tries to beat him up.  It is one of the most truly peculiar scenes in moviedom.

 

 

I am now a big Van Heflin fan.

 

 

You there: go find me a copy of “Johnny Eager."

 


 

Monday, December 12, 2011

Playing cards are the work of the Devil

220px-rws_tarot_15_devil


I have been selling a few odds and ends on eBay lately.  One item was a nice quirky deck of Tarot cards; I got a neat ten bucks for it, and raced to the post office to mail it off to the buyer.

 

 

I can never remember the rules governing Media Mail, and I was shy to tell the lady behind the counter what was actually in the package, so I told a white lie.  “Playing cards,” I said.  “So is it Media Mail?”

 

 

She pondered for a moment, then hollered over her shoulder: “Hey, Steve!  Playing cards.  Media Mail or not?”

 

 

Steve, a skinny bearded man, stuck his head out of the back room.  “Cards are the work of the devil.”

 

 

We all had a good laugh over that one.  “Well,” I said, “that one answers itself.  It can’t possibly be Media Mail.”

 

 

“Yeah,” the lady behind the counter said.  “Imagine if they were Tarot cards!  That’d really be the work of the devil.”

 

 

Now, what voodoo inspired her to say that?  But I stuck with my original lie.  “You can use them for telling fortunes, I suppose,” I said.  “And gambling, and wasting your time with solitaire.  All of which are the devil’s work.”

 

 

I ended up paying $6.20 for Priority Mail.

 

 

Hail Satan!

 


 

Sunday, December 11, 2011

For Advent: Elvis Costello sings "(What's So Funny 'Bout) Peace, Love & Understanding?"

The_best_of_elvis_costello_the_first_10_years


Well, it's the third Sunday of Advent.  I gave up Catholicism for Lent a few years ago and feel much lighter and less burdened as a result, but I respect some of the old traditions.  So: here’s a nice song in the spirit of the season.

 

And, by the way: Elvis is king!

 

09_(What's_So_Funny_'Bout)_Peace,_Love_&_Understanding.mp3 Listen on Posterous


 

 

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Good florists and bad florists

Smallmarch2011


This is another cranky-old-man story.  Please stop reading now if you’re sick of these.

 

 

Still with me?  Okay.  Here we go:

 

 

I wanted to buy flowers for a memorial service that took place on Friday, November 11: Veterans’ Day.  I called my favorite local florist, A New Leaf, a not-for-profit which employs people with psychiatric disabilities; they do lovely arrangements and are generally very fairly priced, but sadly they were closed on Veterans’ Day and couldn’t deliver the flowers.

 

 

I hung up and thought briefly.  There’s another local florist, whom I shall not name – he has a creepily twisted beard, and his shop is on a street which rhymes with Schmickenden, for all you locals – and whom I do not normally use, as I think he is a grimy little gnome.  (Some years ago I was standing behind him in line at a local coffee shop, and he went on and on to someone about his staff, blah blah blah, they weren’t trustworthy, he had to do everything himself, blah blah blah.  I wanted to bludgeon him to death on the spot, on behalf of his staff.)  But, I thought, he’s nearby, and my crazy friend Patricia thinks he’s wonderful, and he can certainly execute a simple commission like this. 

 

 

So I call Grimy Little Gnome and describe what I need.  “And,” I said, “I’d like the flowers delivered tomorrow, noonish.”

 

 

“The flowers,” Gnome said in his haughtiest voice, “will be delivered today.”

 

 

This caught me offguard.  “Beg pardon?” I wheezed.

 

 

“We are closed tomorrow,” he said loftily.  “We will deliver the flowers today.”

 

 

“That’s not appropriate,” I said.  “I don’t want them delivered today.  I want them delivered tomorrow.”

 

 

“That’s simply impossible,” he said coolly.

 

 

“Ah,” I said.  “Let me get back to you.”

 

 

And – click! – down I go with the receiver.

 

 

So I call my third florist – Jephry, on Broadway – who was charming on the telephone, and very sweet.  When I got to the memorial service the next day, the flowers were there, and they were spectacular. I will also say that he didn’t overcharge me at all.

 

 

Moral: when someone gets all diva on you, you should go all diva on them right back. 

 

 

That’ll show ‘em! 


 

Friday, December 9, 2011

BatWorld

Images


At nightfall I like to watch the bats wheeling and swooping over the housetops.  Except that Partner says they’re not bats.  “They’re birds,” he says.

 

 

“Look at them!” I say.  “Birds don’t fly like that!  Also, most birds don’t fly in the dark!”

 

 

He shrugs.  It’s one of those disputes we’ll keep having even after we’ve been put away in the old ladies’ home.

 

 

It’s late autumn now, not really bat season here in southern New England, but I am reminded of this mostly because of the sudden passing of my old boss Sharon.  She and I shared a basement office on the main campus for a couple of years in the 1980s; it wasn’t much, but we got by.  One morning she came in with an odd look on her face.  “There’s something stuck to the wall outside in the hallway,” she said.  “I think it’s a bat.”

 

 

I raced out to see.  Sure enough, it was a tiny bat, clinging to the wall in the hallway, crumpled as if it’d been injured.  I’d seen it as I came into the office that morning, but I’d assumed it was some odd stain on the wall; it was a basement after all, and all kinds of odd things end up on the walls.

 

 

Anyway: Brown University had a bat-research project, and a bat hotline.  We called, and they came over with their butterfly net and gently removed the tiny thing from the wall.

 

 

Today, over twenty years later, Brown still maintains its bat research lab.  I was just reading an article in a campus publication about how carefully they care for the sick and wounded bats.  I can still picture that poor little fellow (or girl) back in the 1980s, who looked as if he/she was in pain, and how glad we were that someone came to take care of her.

 

 

I hope he/she lived to swoop above the treetops again.

 

 

Even if Partner doesn't believe those are really bats.

 

 

Thursday, December 8, 2011

The Providence Public Library

Local-library-tip-lg


The Providence Public Library is a grandiose pile of masonry on the corner of Empire and Washington downtown.  I went in a few times in the late 1970s, but it seemed very hoi polloi to me. (What a nasty little snob I was in those days!)

 

 

Also, I was entering that phase in my life in which it was important that I own books rather than just borrow them.

 

 

Thirty-five years have passed, and my home bookshelves are groaning with books, loved and unloved, read and unread.

 

 

And a few months ago, for some reason, I don’t know why, I went back to the Providence Public Library.

 

 

And I fell in love with the place.

 

 

Let me tell you first that it’s open for less than forty hours a week.  It opens at 12:30pm four days a week, which is a crime against humanity.  I didn’t know that when I first started going there; I got there around 12:15pm one day, and was surprised to see a line of people waiting to get in.  And do you know why most of them were there?  To use the small bank of public-use computers.  By the intense look on their faces, they were job-hunting.  What does that tell you about the usefulness of the public library?

 

 

The other sections of the library – the reference stacks, the reading rooms, the music rooms – are very quiet.  Well, maybe “quiet” is a stupid word to use about a library.  Let us say instead: deserted.

 

 

Which is itself a sin and a shame.

 

 

But I have to admit I enjoyed it.

 

 

I wandered into the fiction section as if by instinct.  I was the only person for miles, amid racks and racks of books, acres and acres of books, with that musty elementary-school smell all around me.  Do you remember those crackly plastic covers that library books always had when we were in school?  They still have them.

 

 

I got my bright blue library card that very first day.  I have been back at least once a week, and I get such pleasure out of it.  I return my last week’s reading in the little basket, and I wander light-headed through the stacks. 

 

 

And I’m borrowing them!  I’ve finally gotten away from the idea that I have to own books!  I used to love the idea that I owned them, they were mine, I could keep them on a shelf and pull them down anytime I wanted to . . .

 

 

Sometime around the ten-thousandth book, this stopped making sense.

 

 

Let’s face it: ultimately we own nothing, not our homes nor our cars, not even our precious books, not even ourselves.

 

 

We can only ever borrow things and use them for a while.

 

 

And maybe libraries are a perfect expression of that.