Total Pageviews
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Movie review: "The Mask of Dimitrios" (1944)
Monday, June 10, 2013
Movie review: "Footlight Parade" (1933)
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Victor Mature
Turner Classic Movies has been showing an awful lot of Victor Mature pictures lately: “The Robe” and “Demetrius and the Gladiators” on Easter, and “My Gal Sal” not long after.
Oh, you don’t know him? See the above photo. Victor Mature (which was, believe it or not, his real name) was a big handsome Italian-American who appeared in a whole bunch of movies in the 1940s and 1950s. He was every cliché you could think of: broad-shouldered, barrel-chested. He was tall, dark, and handsome. His shirt seemed to come off in every single movie he was in. (Even as the songwriter Paul Dresser in “My Gal Sal,” he gets tarred and feathered, and we get to see Carole Landis gently clean the tar and feathers from his immense torso.)
Hollywood is all about pretty girls and handsome men. Back in the 1990s, the house movie reviewer for “Premiere” magazine, Libby Gelman-Waxner (who was really Paul Rudnick), answered a letter from a reader thusly (I paraphrase):
Dear Libby: You seem to like or dislike movies based on whether or not you’re attracted to the lead actors. Libby: that’s not what movies are all about. (signed: Reader.)
Dear Reader: Oh yes it is.
The above photo is from “Samson and Delilah,” in which the lovely but very petite Hedy Lamarr played Delilah. This inspired Groucho Marx’s great comment (which I’ve bowdlerized slightly): “I don’t like seeing movies in which the men’s breasts are bigger than the women’s.”
But you can’t deny that Victor had That Certain Something.
There were lots of other big lugs in movies in those days – Aldo Ray, Gilbert Roland, Jack Carson, Stewart Granger, even Keenan Wynn. They were all big and beefy.
But none of them had big dark vulnerable eyes like Victor Mature.
We miss you, Victor.
Monday, April 1, 2013
Movie review: "Mr. Belvedere Rings The Bell"
Seen not long ago on TCM: “Mr. Belvedere Rings The Bell,” from 1951, with Clifton Webb and Joanne Dru and Zero Mostel and Hugh Marlowe and a host of others.
Clifton Webb's an author / lecturer who wants to pep up an old folks' home; Hugh Marlowe is the good-but-stodgy minister running the place; Joanne Dru is the minister's assistant, who sort of falls in love with Clifton Webb, but who's really in love with Hugh Marlowe. There are also a passel of of wonderful older character actors and actresses playing the denizens of the old folks' home.
And then there’s Zero Mostel, folks. I probably would have switched away, if not for him. 1951? He was testifying in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee that year. Zero didn’t name names, however. It was terrible for his career in the 1950s, but (eventually) he came back, and he triumphed.
In this movie, Zero is (as usual) balding and sweaty and amoral, but finally very sweet. And brilliant, as always. I can only wonder what was going through his head while he was acting in this movie. Was he testifying to Congress while acting in this? Jesus.
And Clifton Webb (who, for me, will always be Waldo Lydecker in “Laura,” typing in the bathtub), is wonderful.
As a movie, “Mr. Belvedere Rings The Bell” is a pleasant nothing. As a period piece, it's interesting. As a time capsule, and an artifact of human culture, it's priceless.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Movie review: "There's No Business Like Show Business"
Recently TCM showed “There’s No Business Like Show Business,” with Dan Dailey and Ethel Merman and Marilyn Monroe and Donald O’Connor and Johnnie Ray and Mitzi Gaynor.
About halfway through, Partner – who was, I think, watching “The Good Wife” in the next room – got up and very quietly closed his door. Too much Mermanization, I assume. She really does fill a room, doesn’t she?
This film is big and bloated, a regular Baby Huey of a movie. It’s the story of a show-business family through the years, from vaudeville to Broadway, with radio along the way. It pulls out all the stops: a son (Johnnie Ray) who becomes a priest, another son (Donald O’Connor) who runs away and joins the army, and – ahem – Marilyn Monroe (extremely unconvincingly) as a big Broadway singing star. (Her big number – “Heat Wave” – is one of the most entertainingly embarrassing musical numbers ever filmed.)
Then there’s the gay angle. Seeing Dan Dailey (the father of the all-singing / all-dancing Donohue clan) and Johnnie Ray (the son who aspires to become a Catholic priest) performing together, along with gay icon Ethel Merman – well, I’m surprised blood didn’t start spurting from my ears. (For those of you who wonder how I know that Dan and Johnnie were gay: well, sadly, Johnnie was arrested several times in the benighted 1950s for soliciting sex with men. Dan was fingered by the 50s Hollywood gossip magazines, and it seems to be pretty much accepted that he was gay. Information from those days is obscure, certainly.)
But, oh my dears, the musical numbers! And the goofiness of the production! This is Hollywood at its Velveeta cheesiest.
Which means also, perversely, that this is Hollywood doing what it does best.
Please put it on your list. One way or the other, whether you think it’s terrible or wonderful, it’s a must-see, a classic.
(Some other time we’ll talk about Ethel Merman and her short-lived marriage to – gasp! – Ernest Borgnine.
(Essay question: what do you suppose that honeymoon was like?)
Monday, February 13, 2012
Movie review: "The Man Who Came To Dinner"
Of the making of movies there is no end. I used to think it was possible to see them all, every single one of them. Of course, that was back in the 1970s, and there were a lot fewer movies back then. Since then – well, the mind boggles. I have given up on that particular life goal.
But there are so many good movies back in the vaults!
That’s why I treasure TCM. They trot them out, the good and the bad and the obscure. They are remarkably judgment-free. I owe them so much, for seeing gems like “Sweet Smell of Success,” and “Fanny,” and “The Heiress.”
Also, just recently, for the very first time in my life, “The Man Who Came to Dinner.”
It’s a filmization of a successful Kaufman/Hart play which they wrote (very obviously) about their friend Alexander Woolcott, a radio personality who had a huge personality but who was also completely insufferable. Sheridan Whiteside (the Woolcott character) is touring the Midwest when he gets (mildly) injured and has to spend December holed up with a nouveau-riche Ohio family, and naturally he takes over the whole house and starts interfering in everything. The cast is rich with talent: Bette Davis as his fed-up secretary, the curvy Ann Sheridan as his bitchy actress friend, Jimmy Durante as Harpo Marx.
But the great revelation here is the brilliant Monty Woolley.
Woolley was a stage actor who’d done the role on Broadway; when Hollywood took on the project, naturally they wanted someone famous, but once they’d signed enough high-powered talent like Bette Davis and Ann Sheridan, they deigned to allow Master Wooley to keep his leading role.
He is amazing. He is evil and dynamic. He is Santa and Satan at the same time. His eyes gleam demonically, and he bares his teeth in the most alarming way. He spends most of the movie in a wheelchair, but you are constantly terrified that he’s going to leap up and beat the hell out of people. He uses “repulsive” and “gruesome” as pet names (as, reportedly, did Woolcott). He ends up being the hero of the day, solving everyone’s problems (and one really wonders if Woolcott was as nice as that).
One of my favorite lines: his nurse, the terrified Mary Wickes, his nurse, sees him eating candy and tells him it’s not good for him. His response: “My great-aunt Jennifer ate a box of candy a day for her entire life. She lived to be one hundred and two, and three days after she died, she looked better than you do now.”
(Postscript: one of my college friends just wrote me a nice New Year’s note to say that he’d just seen this movie on television. “And,” he said, “Sheridan Whiteside always reminds me of you.”)
(I was amazed, and startled, and very very flattered.)
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Margaret Dumont
TCM recently ran a Marx Brothers marathon. I caught bits of “Horse Feathers,” and afterward my very favorite, “Duck Soup.”
I like so many things about the Marx Brothers' movies: the freedom, the cleverness of the dialogue, the stupid obviousness of the slapstick bits, the bizarre/surreal quality of many of the gags, even the sudden lapses into sentimentality when they stop to sing a song.
And I am always thankful when Margaret Dumont shows up.
She is the grand dame who reigns over seven of the Marx Brothers’ movies: the hostess, the millionairess, the unlikely love-interest. She is handsome and stately, like an ocean liner. She has a rich plummy voice, slipping from reedy alto to fluting soprano. She is not at all physical; she generally stands in one place and lets the Marx Brothers run around her like squirrels around an oak tree. She was with the brothers on Broadway in “Cocoanuts” in the 1920s; when they made it into a movie a few years later, she and the brothers reprised their stage roles. This is how Groucho described the action in 1930, in a letter to his friend Arthur Sheekman:
“I arise in the morning and before I have had my clothes on ten minutes, I am over at the theater doing the ordering scene. Then follows thirty minutes of Harpo climbing up Dumont’s leg, and the shirt scene, and then to the dressing room for what I imagine is going to be a good long rest. I am no more than seated with the Morning World, when the buzzer rings and I am downstairs again doing the ordering scene, and Harpo is back again at Dumont’s leg.”
Dumont is queenly and oblivious, the perfect foil. She does reaction shots, seemingly unaware of what she’s reacting to. Groucho later said that, after filming the “Duck Soup” scene in which Groucho shouts “We’re fighting for this woman’s honor, which is more than she ever did!”, Dumont came over to him and said: “Julie [his real name was Julius], what does that line mean?”
(I think Dumont was smarter than this. She’d been on stage for years, after all, and she was no dummy. Here’s one of her quotes from IMDB: “I'm not a stooge, I'm the best straight woman in Hollywood. There's an art to playing it straight. You must build up your man, but never top him, never steal the laughs from him.”)
Film critic Cecelia Ager said it best: “Somebody somewhere should erect a statue to Margaret Dumont, with a plaque reading: “Dedicated to the woman who took an awful lot of guff from the Marx Brothers through the years, and answered it with courage and steadfastness.”
Dumont passed away in 1965, just days after doing a television reenactment (with Groucho!) of their big musical number from 1930’s “Animal Crackers”: “Hooray for Captain Spaulding.”
Her real name was Daisy Baker.
Rest in peace, Daisy.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Movie review: "It Happened on Fifth Avenue"
TCM recently showed a piece of fluff called “It Happened On Fifth Avenue.”
It’s a post-WWII movie, and how! A group of returned GIs are having a hard time finding jobs and housing. They fall in with a charming worldly bum (Victor Moore) who tells them his secret to comfortable living: in the winter, rich people leave their Manhattan mansions and move south. What’s to keep you from moving in? No one will ever know . . .
Naturally Don DeFore, one of the GIs, has hooked up with Gale Storm, who’s actually the daughter of the millionaire (Charlie Ruggles) who owns this particular mansion. A bit later, for various inane reasons, Charlie himself – the millionaire, the owner of the house – pretends to be a hobo and joins the group.
Complications (and hijinks) ensue.
The film's populist tone surprised me. Modern Hollywood would never make a film like this. The real bum (Victor Moore) is constantly lecturing the disguised millionaire (Ruggles) on his behavior. The constant message underneath is that rich people have too much stuff. They have more than one house! More than one everything! In one scene, the poor ex-GIs try to purchase an old Army barracks as part of a business deal; the rich guy beats them to it, and his fat bowler-hatted representative orders everyone off the property. The GIs, incensed, pelt the man with rotten produce (I guess they brought it with them). In a Soviet movie – like one of Sergei Eisenstein’s movies – it would have been rocks, and bullets. Here, it’s played for laughs.
Lots of myths are perpetuated here. The millionaire turns out to be a benevolent guy. The GIs are the salt of the earth. Women are all about love. Victor Moore, the career hobo, is portrayed as the best person of all: kind, thoughtful, and completely oblivious to reality.
Just like real life.
Isn’t that nice?
Honestly, this movie made my skin crawl. I had to switch away to the Jewelry Channel for a while, and look at opalite and cubic zirconia, just for a breather.
But it made me realize also that things don’t change much. It reminded me of the Occupy movement happening right now, and their outrageous notion that rich people have – unaccountably and irrationally and unfairly – too much stuff.
Who says movies aren’t educational?
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Appreciation: Van Heflin
It is now mid-December, and Turner Classic Movies is showing its annual “TCM Remembers” video, which commemorates all of the Hollywood people who have died over the past year. I always find myself going “Oh!”, remembering that Farley Granger, and Dana Wynter, and Len Lesser, and Betty Garrett, and Kenneth Mars, all died this year – and then seeing the long procession of other people of whose passing I was unaware. TCM always does a lovely job of finding brief evocative clips of the actors and actresses looking beautiful, and the behind-the-scenes people looking dignified and busy and intense. It invariably makes me sad, and I love it.
It makes me realize, too, that Hollywood was full of wonderful performers, many of whom even I – the viewer of ten thousand movies, the “Trivial Pursuit: Silver Screen” champion – am unfamiliar with.
For example:
It was Van Heflin’s birthday on December 13. (He would have been 101.) I had the day off, and I ran errands and was very productive, but for much of the day I had the TV on, and they were running a solid string of Van Heflin movies.
Well, I tell you, I had myself a good time.
I read up on Mister Heflin a bit along the way. Born in Oklahoma; went to sea; tried acting, wasn’t successful; Katherine Hepburn gave him a little push, and he finally made it; won an Oscar in 1942 for a supporting role in gangster movie called “Johnny Eager”; never really made it as a leading man, but always delivered a solid performance. Nice face: plain at first, but interesting, and he definitely grows on you. I can see what Miss Hepburn saw.
First was “Tennessee Johnson.” Yes, they actually made a movie biography of President Andrew Johnson! I only saw the last twenty minutes, which was – of course – the impeachment. Lionel Barrymore is the snarling senator who wants Heflin/Johnson out of office. But, of course, as soon as you see Heflin – dignified, courtly, handsome – you realize what’s going to happen. (Hint: it’s not quite what happened in real life, but it makes for good viewing.)
Next came “Green Dolphin Street,” and I yelped with joy, as I’d read the novel in my teens: it’s about a 19th-century goofball in New Zealand who proposes by letter to the wrong sister halfway around the world. (It’s not his fault entirely; he was drunk, and the sisters both had names beginning with “M.”) Anyway, the movie has a great cast – Lana Turner, Donna Reed, Frank Morgan – and Heflin shows up as a tough Englishman in New Zealand, wearing a sort of Maori-styled cowboy outfit. I could just eat him up.
I went out to run some errands, but when I came home, one of the most peculiar movies I’ve ever seen had just begun: “East Side, West Side.” It’s a weepie about virtuous millionairess Barbara Stanwyck and her husband James Mason, a spineless cad who cheats on Barbara with a very kinky Ava Gardner. (I’ll admit it: Ava Gardner terrifies me. She always looks as if she’s just eaten a human baby.) Heflin is a bouncy energetic ex-cop who now works as a mysterious government operative in wartime Europe; he enters the movie as Cyd Charisse’s boyfriend (don’t ask), but falls for Barbara immediately. There is the sweetest and most unrealistic dumping scene I’ve ever seen, in which Cyd tells Van that he can go do what he likes, and summons another man to the table as if by magic to take his place. Then follows – what? – a murder mystery! Ava is found dead, and the murderer is – oh hell, I’ll just tell you – a gigantic blonde bimbo who’s jealous of her. Apparently she strangled Ava with her huge powerful hands (breaking a nail in the process, which of course is a part of the evidence against her). When Van goes to collect her, she tries to beat him up. It is one of the most truly peculiar scenes in moviedom.
I am now a big Van Heflin fan.
You there: go find me a copy of “Johnny Eager."
Friday, December 2, 2011
Movie review: "55 Days at Peking"
When nothing else on television will do – when there’s no RuPaul or Graham Norton or Cupcake Wars – I switch over to Turner Classic Movies. I will accept almost anything that Robert Osborne, in his eternal wisdom, chooses to give me.
The other night it was something unidentifiable: Ava Gardner and Charlton Heston, wearing vaguely Victorian-looking clothing, entering a Chinese temple and dancing to unheard music.
Huh?
Ah. “55 Days at Peking,” a Hollywoodization of the Boxer Rebellion.
First of all, kids, I do not recommend it, unless you are a student of Chinese history, or historiography, or bad movies. It is a horrible botch in just about every regard. Dramatically, no one seems very engaged; there’s a nice cast – David Niven’s in it too, along with Ava and Chuck – but they all appear to be thinking about dinner, or the weekend, or their failing marriages.
At heart it is a Western. The foreigners in Peking - David (of course) represents the British, Chuck the Americans, Ava the Russians (?) - are attacked by Chinese Boxer rebels. We are supposed to sympathize with the Europeans and Americans, who – hm – have been claiming “territorial concessions” in China. The Empress Dowager, a stern old lady with orchids (or possibly hydrangeas) in her hair, is not-so-secretly siding with the Boxers. Prince Tuan, who is quite evidently evil because he has long fingernails and a constipated expression, is not-so-secretly leading the Boxers from within the Forbidden City.
From the point of view of history (and logic), the Chinese were of course in the right; they were trying to protect themselves from arrogant and often violent foreign intervention.
But we cheer as Chuck shoots down the Chinese! He’s not happy about it, of course, but he does it, just as he’d (mopily) shoot down Indians in some other picture. And he looks splendidly sunburnt and muscular in his nice Teddy Roosevelt-style garb, as do all the American soldiers. (I assume this is the way American soldiers dressed in 1900. It’s possible, anyway.)
Let us also mention that the three leading Chinese roles – the Empress Dowager, Prince Tuan, and the Imperial General – are all played by Caucasians. I think most of the Chinese in the mob scenes are played by Chinese, but then again, you never know.
Ah, but wait! We also have a brave young Japanese soldier (played by actual Japanese actor Juzo Itami) fighting alongside Chuck Heston. Remember, this movie was made less than 20 years after World War II. How’s that for diversity and tolerance?
Here's a thought experiment: substitute the Native Americans for the Chinese. The same “territorial concessions” (on a grand scale), the same sense that the side opposing the Americans is noble but wrong . . .
Creepy, isn’t it?
Maybe I recommend this movie after all. It is an object lesson in the creative uses of history.
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
The movies in my head, part one
Apollonia's sister Augusta came to the office recently, and we had a long and lively conversation about old movies. We are both addicted to Turner Classic Movies, as it turns out. She challenged me to come up with a list of my favorite movies. Impossible! But we started naming our favorites, and . . .
“Dodsworth!” Augusta proclaimed. Oh my god what a movie. It's based on a slender but uncharacteristically sweet Sinclair Lewis novel. Walter Huston is a patient man who gets dragged to Europe by his nervous silly wife Ruth Chatterton; he meets Mary Astor, and – well, I won't tell you more. But what a final scene! Who needs CGI when you have acting?
Okay, I'm up to this challenge. Five, four, three, two, one:
The Red Shoes. Spectacular Technicolor, classic plot, incredible acting. Featuring real ballet stars: Moira Shearer, Robert Helpmann, Leonid Massine. And featuring one of my favorite actors, the grave and handsome Anton Walbrook.
Holiday. Katherine Hepburn, Cary Grant, Edward Everett Horton. Glorious Philip Barry 1930s dialogue, and a classy upper-crust setting, and a happy ending. And it has a charming air of insouciance, almost as if the characters were ad-libbing the dialogue – which is just as it should be. “Do you mean your father isn't even a Whoozis?”
Black Narcissus. Another Archers movie, like “Red Shoes,” based on a Rumer Godden novel. The colors and the scenery, oh my God. Apollonia can't stand this movie because of the male lead, David Farrar, an ugly hairy brute who's shirtless for maybe a little too much of the movie. But, for me, it just seems hilarious that this gargoyle actually seems attractive to the sex-starved nuns in the movie.
Witness for the Prosecution. I am not normally a fan of courtroom movies: too claustrophobic. But this one I'm okay with. Charles Laughton as a lawyer, Elsa Lanchester as his nurse. Tyrone Power! Marlene Dietrich! A complex twisty plot, with humor, yet! And every time you think the mystery's resolved, it snarls back up again . . .
Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo. As with courtroom movies, I am not warm to the war-movie genre. This movie is the exception: it's intense and simple and methodical. I understand why they made it: it was a war thing, they needed to show America striking back at Japan. It's the American version of something by Leni Riefenstahl.
Dune. I first saw first in the back yard of the Marine House in Tunis, under the stars, projected onto a sheet. It's one of the most peculiar, spaciest, funniest, scariest movies of all time. It opens with the ethereal Virginia Madsen as Princess Irulan, floating calmly against a starscape, saying calmly, “A beginning is a very delicate time.” It's perfectly magical. The whole movie gets into your head if you watch it more than once. “Wait for my brother, Baron!”
More soon. This is fun.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Sunday blog: Happy birthday, Luise Rainer
Turner Classic Movies recently had a Luise Rainer evening. You know, the Viennese Teardrop. Oh, give up, you don't know. But anyway. She won two Academy Awards in the 1930s, back to back, for “The Great Ziegfeld” and “The Good Earth.”
She is still alive. She turned one hundred and one years old last Wednesday.
Robert Osborne, bless his heart, did an on-stage interview with her back in 2010 when she was one hundred years old, and I just watched it on TCM. And then I watched it again. And then I taped it.
She was tiny and frail and deaf. She was wearing more jewelry than a Macy's Christmas tree.
And she was completely adorable.
“Up until four years ago, I was still so – vivid. And then I fell - idiotically - on the back of my head. And a normal person would have broken her neck. But it did not. I am a strong girl.”
And:
“First I married a beautiful man, a pIaywright, and I adored him. Clifford Odets! But we divorced. And then I found a man who was beautiful inside and out, and I married him. And he loved me idiotically! And we were very happy for forty-seven years. And he was kind, and loving, and - most importantly - to him I was the center of the universe. And that was good.”
And:
“Louis B. Mayer! Oh! He said I was Frankenstein, I would ruin the company. He was not fond of me. I was in his office, he told me that sometimes actresses sit on his knee. I said, “Mister Mayer, I will not sit on your knee.”
I paraphrase. But it doesn't matter.
Happy belated birthday, Luise. And many more.
I love you idiotically.

